<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 365 Plays/365 Days - Week 52</title>
	<link>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Justin Palmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-298</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-298</guid>
					<description>whoo boy, Brant! that's one tall order of a question. hard to answer. i &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; seen my fair share of the 365 Plays. i've directed two (weeks 34, 48), acted in one (week 12), and seen countless others. despite TimeOut Chicago's greatest efforts to report the contrary, i think these plays all have merit in and of themselves. and by virtue of the fact that they got 52 companies in our city -- and 16 others -- to get up and play is merit enough. sure, some of the plays hit me in a more meaningful way than others, but that's sort of the point, isn't it? WE'RE ALL taking part in them, and it is the community's responsibility to stand up and say what they dug about them or didn't. now, to determine success of the Week 52 plays on the basis of their form is really a philosophical issue, isn't it?:

What is &quot;a play?&quot; 

that discussion i'll leave for another time. for &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt;, what works or doesn't with these plays -- or any plays for that matter -- is which ones engage me, which ones make me laugh, make me want to watch them over again, which ones do i find myself thinking about a couple of days later, which ones do i turn to somebody i don't really know and say &quot;hey, did you just see that?&quot;. for instance, right after i saw the Steppenwolf digital plays i emailed a colleague and said &quot;go watch these Steppenwolf plays right now so we can talk about them&quot;. so, for the sake of the blog, and because you're my friend Brant, i'll indulge. sure. i'd love to know what others thought of the these plays, too. here goes:

- Nine-Eleven: i loved how dry a rendering of such a &quot;wet&quot; subject matter it had. it's rare we're asked to think about 9/11 devoid of sentiment, and i appreciated that attempt. plus, i think computer voices are oddly effective. to my ear, for some reason, they make words mean different things than human voices.
- Talkback: i'm a playwright. i'm trying to finish a script right now. i laughed like hell. i watched it a second time and laughed even harder. stellar photogenicness by Dave.
- The Blank Before The World: i had to watch it twice to see if i was equally as impressed by the pairing of visual/sound the second time. and i was. 

for what it's worth, i posted a lengthy blog on The Next Theatre's blogroll back in October (called &quot;She's Always Got Something Hidden Inside&quot;) about how i found understanding in the week 48 plays; what process i used to get at them. others might find it interesting. also, i posted a blog on the Sandbox Theatre Project blog (called &quot;Won't You Be My Neighbor&quot;) about how our use of space elucidated the week 34 plays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoo boy, Brant! that&#8217;s one tall order of a question. hard to answer. i <i>have</i> seen my fair share of the 365 Plays. i&#8217;ve directed two (weeks 34, 48), acted in one (week 12), and seen countless others. despite TimeOut Chicago&#8217;s greatest efforts to report the contrary, i think these plays all have merit in and of themselves. and by virtue of the fact that they got 52 companies in our city &#8212; and 16 others &#8212; to get up and play is merit enough. sure, some of the plays hit me in a more meaningful way than others, but that&#8217;s sort of the point, isn&#8217;t it? WE&#8217;RE ALL taking part in them, and it is the community&#8217;s responsibility to stand up and say what they dug about them or didn&#8217;t. now, to determine success of the Week 52 plays on the basis of their form is really a philosophical issue, isn&#8217;t it?:</p>
<p>What is &#8220;a play?&#8221; </p>
<p>that discussion i&#8217;ll leave for another time. for <i>me</i>, what works or doesn&#8217;t with these plays &#8212; or any plays for that matter &#8212; is which ones engage me, which ones make me laugh, make me want to watch them over again, which ones do i find myself thinking about a couple of days later, which ones do i turn to somebody i don&#8217;t really know and say &#8220;hey, did you just see that?&#8221;. for instance, right after i saw the Steppenwolf digital plays i emailed a colleague and said &#8220;go watch these Steppenwolf plays right now so we can talk about them&#8221;. so, for the sake of the blog, and because you&#8217;re my friend Brant, i&#8217;ll indulge. sure. i&#8217;d love to know what others thought of the these plays, too. here goes:</p>
<p>- Nine-Eleven: i loved how dry a rendering of such a &#8220;wet&#8221; subject matter it had. it&#8217;s rare we&#8217;re asked to think about 9/11 devoid of sentiment, and i appreciated that attempt. plus, i think computer voices are oddly effective. to my ear, for some reason, they make words mean different things than human voices.<br />
- Talkback: i&#8217;m a playwright. i&#8217;m trying to finish a script right now. i laughed like hell. i watched it a second time and laughed even harder. stellar photogenicness by Dave.<br />
- The Blank Before The World: i had to watch it twice to see if i was equally as impressed by the pairing of visual/sound the second time. and i was. </p>
<p>for what it&#8217;s worth, i posted a lengthy blog on The Next Theatre&#8217;s blogroll back in October (called &#8220;She&#8217;s Always Got Something Hidden Inside&#8221;) about how i found understanding in the week 48 plays; what process i used to get at them. others might find it interesting. also, i posted a blog on the Sandbox Theatre Project blog (called &#8220;Won&#8217;t You Be My Neighbor&#8221;) about how our use of space elucidated the week 34 plays.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brant Russell</title>
		<link>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-289</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-289</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Justin.  As a theater artist in this town, and someone who runs your own company, I know you've seen your share of these plays. 

What do you think worked about the ones you liked?  And feel free to discuss pieces that you didn't like, as well.

I'm curious about what determines &quot;success&quot; in this new form...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Justin.  As a theater artist in this town, and someone who runs your own company, I know you&#8217;ve seen your share of these plays. </p>
<p>What do you think worked about the ones you liked?  And feel free to discuss pieces that you didn&#8217;t like, as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about what determines &#8220;success&#8221; in this new form&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Justin Palmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-287</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-287</guid>
					<description>friggin' LOVE 'EM!

i especially liked Nine-Eleven, Talkback, and The Blank Before The World. 

good work, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>friggin&#8217; LOVE &#8216;EM!</p>
<p>i especially liked Nine-Eleven, Talkback, and The Blank Before The World. </p>
<p>good work, people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Justin Palmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-285</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.steppenwolf.org/2007/11/05/365-plays365-days-week-52/#comment-285</guid>
					<description>congrats on this, Brant! i look forward to seeing what these &quot;digital plays&quot; are like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congrats on this, Brant! i look forward to seeing what these &#8220;digital plays&#8221; are like.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
